Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 11:48
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
'No Kings' protests against Trump planned nationwide to coincide with military parade - NPR
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Which is the most liked web series in India?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
5-Day Workout Plan That Melts Belly Fat for Men Over 50, Trainer Says - Eat This Not That
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
These are the best new MacBook deals in June: options starting at $649 - 9to5Mac
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
OpenAI’s first AI device with Jony Ive won’t be a wearable - The Verge
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
SpaceX launches Sirius XM radio satellite to orbit, lands rocket on ship at sea (photos) - Space